Saturday, December 15, 2007

COMMUNISTS IN NEPAL HAVE BECOME A STOOGE OF THE INDIAN ESTABLISHMENT

FIVE QUESTIONS
http://www.telegraphnepal.com/news_det.php?news_id=2165

Sadhya Bahadur Bhandari, Central Secretariat Member, Jan Morcha-United Front, Nepal
Mr. Sadhya Bahadur Bhandari is a central secretariat member of Jan Morcha-Nepal. Mr. Bhandari is also the coordinator of the Janmorcha task force on Nationalism. He is at the moment passionately involved in exploring unlawful/illegal citizenship distribution by the government in the recent past which he claims as to have been done in haste by the seven party alliances in the establishment.. We at this paper have had an opportunity to talk to this gentleman last week. Below the results: ed.

TGQ1: What is the reason for the Terai revolt? And how have you been analyzing the inundation problem in Terai? Your valuable illuminating comments please!

Mr. Bhandari: There are some specific reasons behind the Terai revolt this time. Mainly it is the age old class exploitation that is the root cause, as I see it. The exploitation, of the Indigenous groups of Terai such as Koche, Meche, Jhangad, Rajbanshi. Chidiyar, Dusadh, Tatma, Batar, Kahar, Mushar, Dome, Chamar, Mahut and Yadhav, Sah, Teli and others who are the real Nepalese, at the hands of handful immigrants originating from India is the real cause for revolt. Most of these Indigenous Nepalese in Terai are poor, homeless, and exploited to the hilt. Unfortunately the power belongs to these immigrants from India.

The trend of acquiring Nepali citizenship by the non-Nepalese to capture the resources in Madhesh thus forcing the locals to be displaced, the indiscriminate and the continued encroachment of the Nepali Terai by the Indian side with the support of the military, the irrigation-problem, the inundation problem due to the illegal dam construction again by the Indian side, the presence of Indian security personnel right inside the Nepali Territory and their presence aiding indiscriminate killings, abductions, ransom, lootings and above all Nepal Government’s silence towards such activities have finally contributed to the happenings of the episodes of Lahan, Gaur, Kapilvastu and Nepalgunj to happen frequently. Many more could be in the pipelines…..

To talk on the issue of Inundation in Terai, there are basically six points I would like to mention.

First, all along the 1808Kms long Nepal-India border there is the encroachment of the Indian side into the Nepali territory. Such act of threatening Nepali sovereignty by India is currently on in eighty-five different places along the border. Except Kalapani where some 8 Lakh Ropani-corresponding to some seven hundred hectares, the traditional friend India has captured around some 1.3 million hectares of Nepali lands.

Secondly, the unequal treaty of 1956 between India and Nepal, wherein India was allowed to enter 30 Km inside the Nepali territory, thus within few years time Indian forces had entered Bhairahaba, Nepalgunj, Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, and along 18 points- close to Nepal-Tibet border inside the Nepali territory. Similarly, the treaties of Gandak, Koshi and Mahakali allowed Indian side to use Nepali water for free leaving the Nepali side in drought during the cultivating season. How sad! More 2.3 million hectares- of Nepali lands face water shortages. Thus, the issues of West Seti, Electric export, and the treaties of 1950, 1965, 1990 prove that Nepal is virtually under the Indian siege.

Thirdly, there is the river linking project.

It is the 12,500 Km long network of 37 different rivers from Nepal and India, connecting them at 30 different locations, to produce 34 KMW of electricity, to bring drinking water in the major five Indian Metropolitan cities and 150 districts. Construct dams in 83 districts to control floods and irrigate 4 Crore hectares of Land, to irrigate 207 drought affected districts, relief in 91 districts and irrigation in 101 districts land surfacing 3 Crore 40 Lakhs hectares. The objective is to feed 1 Billion 65 crores of population producing 45 Crore Metric Tons of food items at a cost of 200 Billion USD. Shame on the government here.

Thus plans are to bring water from the Northern side of India to the South. This means that more than 6 Crore hectares of lands in the northern side will be affected adversely. The plan to cope with this is to build 56 dams along the India-Nepal border. The construction of 11 dams has already begun. Due to these construction, more than 15 lakhs of the Terains and thousands of hectares of land faced inundation only this year, for example. The final goal, if achieved, by then, most of the cultivable Nepali lands will be converted into a huge reservoir of water.

Fourthly, the problem is the Military Gherao. Since last five years, India has deployed the BSF(Border Security Forces) all along the Nepal-India border. There are around 31,750 Central Commanders and 27,000 snipers in the BSF. The plan is to establish 235 posts along the border. Until now India has already established a temporary post in every 2 kilometer distance and a permanent post in 6 kilometer distance consisting of BSF men equipped with modern arms and ammunitions. The distance from the Nepali territory is merely 2 meters. Recently, India has also decided to set up 450 check posts until March 2008, equipped with computerized database system to track the movement of people. This India!

Surprising it is to know that along the Indo-Nepal border in the 1500 Km distance there are 65 battalions of soldiers however, along the 4069 Km of Indio-Bangla border there are only 50 battalions.

Fifthly, a data by the Indian ministry of Foreign Affairs reveals that until 1980 there were more than 38 Lakhs Indian immigrants living in Nepal, among them 23,87,973 had already acquired the Nepali Citizenship and that more than 2 Lakh Indian immigrants move to Nepal from the Indian side each year. Similarly, yet another Nepal Government data reveals that every 12.5seconds an Indian immigrant enters into the Nepali territory in search of food, job and shelter and thus he gets finally settled. The fact that the living standard of a poor Nepali is much better than those of the marginalized groups in the state of the Uttar Pradesh and Bihar thus it is only natural that Nepal has become a place of work for more than 7 Crore Indian citizens. Poor Biharis!

Sixthly, it is the citizenship issue and the cultural exchange between the two countries. In the referendum of 1980, the then prime minister Surya Bahadur Thapa in a bid to protect the Panchayati Raj included the names of the Indians in the voting list. Since the 12-Point agreement was made between the Maoists and the SPA leadership, India with a single point agenda forced the Nepali regime to award citizenship to those who were included in the voting list. India won that game too.

And the government’s decision to award more citizenship certificates to more migrants from India have kept the indigenous Terai groups in a minority. The current Terai uprising, the indiscriminate killings are the results of the inner pressure exerted by those Indian immigrants who are represented in various Terai/Madhesi parties, groups to create anarchy in the country. Even the Maithili, Bhojpuri, Awadhi cultures are in Minority in the Madhesh. We must be very careful.

TGQ2: The postponement of the Constitution Assembly Election yet again, do you still see Royal Palace behind this indefinite postponement too?

Mr. Bhandari: The fault clearly lies among the political parties for the poll postponement. The royalists may not want the elections to be held on time but this does not mean they have become successful in foiling the elections. The problem is clearly is an internal one which is related to the inefficiency of the parties in alliance.

And there is no environment for polls at all. In the western region there are the demands of the Tharu, and the Kamaiyas to be addressed. The demands of the Indigenous/janajatis are yet not fulfilled, the Terai is burning and above all the security situation is not congenial for the polls. The government itself is not serious for the CA elections. The SPA supreme leadership is not in the government and among the current cabinet members there is no one totally committed for the polls. Only the NC leadership is in the government structure, pity it is that they do not want polls. In fact, the NC was never prepared for the elections. The Maoists with no concrete reason are facing criticisms for the polls postponement. In reality it is the government and the SPA leadership in all that is responsible. Finally, I do not see the current leadership conducting CA polls successfully.

TGQ3: You have been of late criticizing the Delhi Sponsored “12-Point Agreement” and its impact, is it your personal opinion or your Party’s official version?

Mr. Bhandari: There are few points in the 12-Point Agreements that need applauding. Nepal was indulged in a never ending violent conflict. The conflict itself had become a mode of commerce to the then rulers. Talks were held with the armed outfit but no positive outcome had been achieved. The weapon trade with the support of the imperialists and the expansionists was flourishing. Thus, the 12-Point Agreement initially came as a first step towards institutionalizing permanent peace. However, I have been criticizing only those points on the agreement that could be finally exploited by the imperialists and the expansionists to create further disorder.

However, later it was understood, that the 12-Point Agreement was made possible only with the direct intervention of the Indian rulers of the likes of Sita Ram Yechuri, Shyam Sharan, S.D.Muni, Ashok Meheta. M.K.Rasgotra, A.Sehgal, D.P.Trtipathi, and K.V.Rajan. Public acceptance of Comrade Prachanda that the agreement was made on Delhi’s direct aegis and the declaration of Comrade Rohit (NMKP) that the draft of the agreement was well written in Hindi Language is itself a proof that Delhi was directly involved in forging an agreement among the political actors of Nepal.

The fact that the UNMIN (UN Mission in Nepal) too receives directives on Political and Diplomatic issues from the South-Block mandarins seated at the Room No. 38 of the UN office-Nepal, and only that it is allowed to monitor the peace process is no less intriguing.

Presently, it is known to all that Excellency Girija Prasad Koirala has been sheltering a South-Block agent right at the PM’s official residence. His job primarily is to provide counseling service to the Eight Party Leadership, facilitating the NC and the Maoists to come to terms on several diverging stances, to convey decisions made by our cabinet to the South-Block and seek directives from there on each and every political issue that are our internal ones. It is also revealed that his job is to aid the Terai uprising being manipulated right from Delhi.

All these I see as a revival of what happened in 1950s. In those days in a cabinet meet or in the King’s secretariat, respectively Chandreshwor Narayan Singh (Indian Ambassador) and Govinda Narayan Singh (Indian citizen) used to be present on a regular basis. At present, Mr. Amresh Kumar Singh represents India here. He is respectfully welcomed by our leaders in all Eight Party meet and is also appointed an advisor to the Prime Minister.

In 1950s, the Communist Parties, more so Comrade Pushpa Lal protested against such Indian necked intervention. However, the same but some what “nouveau” communists in Nepal have become a stooge of the Indian establishment.

There are very few who understand this side story of the 12-Point Agreement, nevertheless the mass is growing and being fully aware of all these. It is time that the mass must be told of all that made the 12 point agreement possible under the aegis of New Delhi establishment..

TGQ4: How do you view the Maoists quitting the government first and forwarding the 22-Points Demands immediately after that? Do you see such a Maoist act aiding the Monarch instead?

Mr. Bhandari: I see that the Maoists have left the government structure only to propagate their 22-Poiints demands among the public. The demands are sensible as well, for me. If you analyze deeply it is the Nepali Congress that forced the Maoists to quit the government and to raise those demands. It is the NC hegemony to capture the Prime Minister ship, Ministries of Defense, Home and Finance that is the cause of Maoists quitting the government. From the NC leadership it was getting impossible to think that the election could have been conducted free and fair. It is true that if elections are not conducted immediately, King could benefit a bit but in the backdrop that he is already sidelined I do not think that it will affect that much in the long run.

I do not see that there is a Palace-Maoist nexus in foiling the elections. It is rubbish allegation. It is only the NC that is responsible for all these set back.

TGQ5: Why is this hullabaloo after General Ashok Mehta’s remarks on the possible deployment of Indian Army in Nepal? Is it the anti-India phobia in Nepal?

Mr. Bhandari: Gen. Mehta’s remarks that “the deployment of India Army in Nepal does not need a clear nod from Nepal’s leadership but it can do it on its own will” is noting but clearly a voice of the Indian leadership. The fact that General Mehta is a member of the higher echelon of the security strategists in India adds strength to my point. The South-Block rebuke is a diplomatic ploy. There was clearly a tacit agreement with the South-Block establishment and Mehta that first he will make such a statement that would be later rebuked. Delhi’s double play indeed.

If one remembers in 1990, the then India’s foreign Secretary S.K.Singh had forwarded a proposal to King Birendra that said if Nepal’s Security and Foreign Affairs were handed over to India, the uprising would be crsuhed immediately.

Similarly, in 1997 K.R Malkani even said Nepal has to be sikkimized. Few years later India’s foreign Minister Natwar Singh while meeting Madhav Kumar Nepal had proposed deploying Indian Army in Nepal. Next year India’s State Minister for Foreign Affairs, E. Ahmad supporting Natwar Singh’s proposal made statement at a Bouddhist gathering.

Few Years back Ashok Mehta when visited Nepal making a hair-raising statement had said, “If US can attack Iraq for Oil, India too can attack Nepal to capture its huge water resources”.

In a Track-II meeting sponsored by the South Block the issue of Indian army deployment again cropped up. Latest is the BBC interview of Gen Mehta wherein he reaffirms this long standing belief of the Indian ruling class. In reality, he has spoken the truth; the South-Block has officially lied by claiming that his remarks were personal.

Finally, his statement is a direct threat to the Nepali sovereignty and its independence. This has hurt the Nepali people.

For me this Indian intervention is the result of the open slavery by our own leaders to the Indian expansionists, following to their directives on our internal affairs, keeping mum over the issues of continuous land encroachment, unequal treaties, illegal dam construction, and Indian criminals creating havoc in Nepali Terai among so many issues.

The Terai has become the break point of the Nepali nationalism. To safeguard the Nepali Nationalism, the Terai has to be given the top priority. However, the government is not serious on this.

Our boundary is being encroached day in day out. Those encroached lands must be brought back. The open-border must be closed. A simple visa system must be enacted; the Indian immigrants should get a work permit with an up-to-date record management system. Their security must be guaranteed.

The unlawful destruction of citizenship certificates must be examined. Unequal treaties must be annulled.

The illegal dam constructed by India must be destroyed.

2007-10-17 06:24:03

No comments: